Comments on: Swift 389 Skin https://atsmods.lt/swift-389-skin/ Tue, 06 Sep 2016 09:21:38 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0 By: amastron https://atsmods.lt/swift-389-skin/#comment-15982 Tue, 06 Sep 2016 09:21:38 +0000 http://atsmods.lt/?p=8343#comment-15982 In reply to Tazburg.

No Owner Operator with a Pete 389, in there right mind would be leased to Swift!!

]]> By: Danny https://atsmods.lt/swift-389-skin/#comment-13469 Sun, 26 Jun 2016 22:37:57 +0000 http://atsmods.lt/?p=8343#comment-13469 It’s missing the missing bumper and other damage to the rig… it is swift after all.

]]> By: Tazburg https://atsmods.lt/swift-389-skin/#comment-13463 Sun, 26 Jun 2016 20:05:51 +0000 http://atsmods.lt/?p=8343#comment-13463 The skin would work on the pete with two words added to the skin, ” leased to ”
Then your a owner operator that’s leased to Swift.

]]> By: swiftrans https://atsmods.lt/swift-389-skin/#comment-13462 Sun, 26 Jun 2016 18:29:29 +0000 http://atsmods.lt/?p=8343#comment-13462 wouldnt call the 389 a fleet rig more like the t680 and 579

]]> By: renenate12 https://atsmods.lt/swift-389-skin/#comment-13461 Sun, 26 Jun 2016 17:42:26 +0000 http://atsmods.lt/?p=8343#comment-13461 does not show properly

]]> By: Truckguy https://atsmods.lt/swift-389-skin/#comment-13452 Sun, 26 Jun 2016 13:08:07 +0000 http://atsmods.lt/?p=8343#comment-13452 It is a bit to simple….it should have DOT numbers and GVWR rating and location of the company.

]]>